Doctors Expose the Flaws in Virus Policies

One of the most distressing aspects of the pandemic is the way governments, other official bodies and their acolytes go to extreme lengths to suppress all facts, theories, even opinions, that conflict with theirs… even though they occasionally later reverse their positions, proving that some of their suppressed critics were right in the first place.

In Belgium a group of 394 medical doctors and 1,340 other health professionals have published an “open letter” to the world’s public health authorities challenging much of the received wisdom about Covid-19 that we’re being forced to believe and act upon. They identify, in 51 footnotes, the sources all the alternative facts they identify. The “objective facts” that show “a completely different reality.”

Their conclusion is that there is no longer any medical justification for the measures, often extreme such as shutdowns, that have devastated all countries and the global economy. “The current crisis management has become totally disproportionate and causes more damage than it does any good,” the doctors say.

Here are the most interesting in the English-language version of the letter you can read on the American Institute for Economic Research website…

► The PCR test produces many false positives and a greatly exaggerated – “exponential” – picture. The test was rushed into use via an emergency procedure and “was never seriously self-tested.” Its creator “expressly warned that this test was intended for research – and not for diagnostics.

“If someone tests positive, this does not mean that that person is actually clinically infected, is ill, or is going to become ill.” It does not justify the social measures imposed by governments, which are based solely on these PCR tests.

► Lockdowns: If the waves of infection in countries with strict lockdown policies are compared to countries that did not (Sweden, Iceland) we see similar outcomes. “There is no link between the imposed lockdown and the course of the infection. Lockdown has not led to a lower mortality rate.”

► For thousands of years the human body has been exposed daily to infectious micro-organisms (viruses, bacteria and fungi). Their penetration is prevented by the immune system. Most people have a congenital or general immunity to viruses Their systems neutralize the coronavirus, so they experience few or no symptoms.

Social distancing is damaging to health

“Most people… have a congenital or cross-immunity” because they have already been in contact with variants of the same virus. “Only people with a weak or faulty immune system should be protected by extensive hygiene or social distancing.”

► Studies have shown that the more social and emotional commitments people have, the more resistant they are to viruses. Isolation and quarantine have fatal consequences. Particularly for many older people forced to stay indoors.

► Covid-19’s mortality has turned out to be many times less than originally predicted by the experts, “and close to that of a normal seasonal flu.” The vast majority of those who have died were aged 80 or older, while most of younger deaths are those with underlying disorders such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes, chronic lung afflictions or obesity.

► There is “an affordable, safe and efficient therapy available for those who do show severe symptoms of the disease” – hydroxychloroquine, zinc and Azithromycin. Rapidly applied, this therapy often prevents hospitalization and leads to recovery. “Hardly anyone has to die now.”

This effective therapy has been confirmed by clinical experience ‘with impressive results” in the US and France, as well as research in Switzerland comparing mortality rates with and without the therapy.

This positive experience contrasts sharply with theoretical criticism – insufficient substantiation by double-blind studies – which in some countries, such as the Netherlands, has even led to a ban on the therapy. But a critical meta-analysis in the scientific journal The Lancet has been withdrawn as unreliable.

► Spreading occurs in closed, unventilated rooms. “Contamination is… not possible in the open air. Contact tracing and epidemiological studies show that healthy people (or positively tested asymptomatic carriers) are virtually unable to transmit the virus.

“Healthy people therefore do not put each other at risk.” This “seriously calls into question the whole policy of social distancing and compulsory mouth masks for healthy people – there is no scientific basis for this.”

Oral masks “belong in contexts where contacts with proven at-risk groups or people with upper respiratory complaints take place, and in a medical context/hospital/retirement-home setting.” In the case of healthy people they are “ineffective against the spread of viral infections.”

► As viruses mutate continually, vaccines are “at most a temporary solution.” in ten years only three times have anti-influenza vaccines been developed with an efficiency rate or more than 50 per cent. With people older than 75 “efficacy is almost non-existent.”

An anti-Covid vaccine “implemented by emergency procedure, and for which manufacturers have already obtained legal immunity from possible harm, raises serious questions.” On a global scale, “700,000 cases of damage or death are expected as a result of such a vaccine.” The Belgian doctors say “we do not wish to use our patients as guinea-pigs.

“The relentless bombardment” of the public with figures day after day without interpretation, without comparing them to flu deaths in other years, and without comparing them to deaths from other causes, “has induced a real psychosis of fear… This is not information, this is manipulation.”

There is an infodemic, one openly called for by the World Health Organization – all opinions divergent from those of the official discourse, including those by experts with different views, are silenced “by an unprecedented media censorship.”